Knowledge Networking Portal for Sustainable & Responsible Tourism
Contributor | Sabrina Vecchio Ruggeri |
---|---|
Country | Austria, |
Keywords |
|
Release date | 23/06/2014 |
Topics |
|
GSTC Criteria for Destinations |
|
Type | (Best Practice Destination) |
# | File name | Contributor | Release date | Uploaded by | Upload date | Size | Content type |
---|
Good Practice Innovation Sheet | ||||
Items | Description | |||
1. WHO | ||||
Key people and organisations (initiator, leader, partners) | Landlust (“lust for land” or “countryside delight”) | |||
TRV Thermenland Steiermark & TRV Oststeiermark | ||||
Key Figures | Surface | Inhabitants | Tourism arrivals | Tourism nights |
3357 km2, 3 districts | 266.400 | we didn’t get the info – appr. average of 4-5 nights per stay (in summer up to 14 nights, in winter 2-4 nights) |
2012: +/-12.500 nights – some of the houses have an average of 230 to 250 nights per year (!), others have appr. 150 n/y. *2 owners didn’t inform us; in 28 houses were 12.354 nights |
|
2. WHY | ||||
Reason for taking the good practice action | The eastern part of Styria was located next to the “iron curtain” neighbouring with Hungary and Slovenia. It was a very rural region with little industry and few places to work. The farms were small and often run by part time farmers. So the region belonged to the poorest in Austria. For this reason people on the country side lived often in rather old but historic houses. Only after the fall of the iron curtain and the detection of hot springs – which led to investments in spa tourism – the situation changed and in the 1980s and 1990s the region began to blossom. The old farm houses were abandoned; people built new houses and moved there. So the old rural houses remained but had no use anymore. It was/is an important challenge to maintain these beautiful old houses as they are an important part of the historical heritage of our country. |
|||
Issues and challenge |
The assignment was to convince owners of old houses to invest time and money, |
|||
3. HOW | ||||
Methods /steps / tools used (to develop the good practice) |
In close cooperation with the government of Styria (especially the “Revitalisation |
|||
4. RESULT | ||||
Specific/measurable results, benefits |
- Rising awareness about the value of the regional heritage among the population - Landlust hast – contrary to the other accommodation providers in the region – up to 50 % guests from abroad (the normal rate in spa tourism is 90 % Austrians!) - a new mission statement was developed in 2013 with the focus on sustainable evolvement. |
|||
Recognitions (e.g. awards) | 2011 runners up Eden Award Austria 2006 Lafer Award-winner for the best „Package offer with Heart“ 2005 FM-Ideas-Contest winner in category „Cooperation“ 2004 Styrian Tourism Award in the category „Development of Topics and Products in Tourism“ | |||
5. REFLECTION | ||||
Lessons learned | The lessons are manifold. Just some points: - The actors involved have to be taken by the hand and supported honestly and in many ways, then they really grow and become experts in the field of tourism and revitalisation. - Time is an important factor: for many house owners it took much more time to decide and finally implement the suggestions than was foreseen in the project plan. Some started from 2002 and are still not finished with the restoration of their house. So it needs lots of patience (plus financial support and/or voluntary work) to implement this kind of idea. - If there are even just a few people enthusiastic about the idea/project then the “fire” can be spread among the group. In Landlust many of the members are really engaged and burn for the idea of preserving old farm houses and also for the good care of their guests. It was amazing to watch them growing (in some cases) from simple farmers/housewives into strong personalities with much knowledge about tourism, internet platforms, marketing, guest care taking and other topics. | |||
Challenges met | During the project phase but also later Landlust was invited to present the ideas in several countries and regions as it seems to be quite attractive for areas with old houses that are not used. But until now we didn’t hear that anyone picked this idea to implement it in another region. | |||
Critical success factors | We would be glad to give support / cooperate with destinations that are going in the same direction. | |||
6. MORE | ||||
web-references, documents | www.landlust.at |